Term paper on An Argument Against Gun Control

Free An Argument Against Gun Control papers

Death Penalty
Whenever the word "death penalty" comes up, extremists from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says deterrence, the other side says there's a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. However,

Give Subordinates The Honor When They Succeed;
1. Its 0630 and I’m in full service dress blues. I’ve been told that I must report to the Wing Deputy Commander to explain the actions of a Communication Security (COMSEC) incident that has occurred in my section. I am in charge of the account but did not personally have anything to do w

An Argument Against Gun Control

An Argument Against Gun Control As long ago as 1789, the creators of the

Constitution realized the importance of guns in American society. The Second

Amendment states,"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of

a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be

infringed." No loopholes, or legal caches exist in this statement. The Founding

Fathers allow for no restriction of the private ownership of firearms. Yet, in

recent years anti-gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the name of

crime prevention. Gun control makes no effort to control criminals, does not

reduce crime, takes guns from responsible sportsmen and recreational shooters,

and allows criminals to possess firearms superior to those of the public.

Advocates that support the cause of control claim that controlling firearms will

lesson criminal action. Gun control does nothing to control criminals. The

fundamental flaw in the thinking of anti-gun polititions is that guns don't kill

people. People kill people. The same logic that leads one to control firearms

could also lead one to endeavor to control automobiles and fast food simply

because they are instrumental in millions of deaths per year. Why when

Americans reject such an absurd theory as "Automobile Control," which do not

infringe the constitution,. would these same individuals embrace an idea as gun

control? People accept gun control, but if a politician would suggest

"controlling" fast food restaurants because the fatty food causes heart problems

and deaths, the public would scorn his insane proposal. Ultimately, people's

choices lead them to drive recklessly, overindulge in unhealthy food, and use

firearms to commit violent crimes. So, criminals should be controlled, not the

guns which they share with millions of law-abiding citizens. Gun control

supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate. Gun control does nothing

to reduce crime. A study conducted by the Urban Institute regarding The

Clinton Gun Ban Law of 1995, finds that "because the banned guns and

magazines were never used in more than a fraction of all gun murders, even

the maximum theoretically achievable preventive effect of the ban on gun

murders is almost certainly too small to detect statistically..." Joseph

Constance, the Deputy Police Chief of Trenton, New Jersey, states: "Assault

weapons are used in an underwhelming .026 of 1%...