Affirmative Action A Need For Reform Term paper

While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (affirmative action a need for reform)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!

King 1

Affirmative Action: A Need for Reform

The goal of affirmative action was not (or at least should not have been) to promote diversity.

The goal should have been to promote and ensure equality of opportunity for people regardless of

race, color, creed, gender or national origin. The system that has evolved since the civil rights

legislation of the 1960's is a misapplication of its original intent. Laws have been passed, quotas

have been established and seemingly, everything has been done to prevent discrimination, but

these new laws and quotas are only discriminating against a new group of people--the qualified

white male. The affirmative action system originally may have had a just intent, but I

sincerely believe it has been counterproductive in practice.

Affirmative action by design was intended to help minorities and women reach the same

levels of opportunity as the so-called majority, but in the process, reverse discrimination has

taken place. Graglia believes "affirmative action" has become simply a deceptive label for racial

preferences (31). This discrimination transgresses the basic American ideal that all people are

equal before the law and must be treated as individuals. With the mass media rarely recognizing

quotas much less portraying white males sympathetically, Peter Lynch, a sociological researcher,

states "white males have been silently victimized one by one" (qtd. in Brimelow and Spencer).

Now , in order to be employed, qualifications do not always matter as much as the color of a

person's skin or his ethnicity. Race and gender-based preferences have no place in an affirmative

action program. Race preferences were originally reserved for the approximately twelve-percent

of Americans who are black (O'Sullivan 22). Today their beneficiaries of racial preference

King 2

include Hispanics, Asians, Pacific Islanders, Native Americans, Alaskan natives and immigrants

who belong to the "protected classes." A whopping one-third of the population is currently

covered by race preferences--a figure that is predicted to inflate to about fifty-percent by the year

2050 since immigration from Third World countries is primarily responsible for transforming

America demographically (O'Sullivan 22). These statistics essentially mean that a white male is

now almost three times as likely to suffer officially imposed negative discrimination as he was

thirty years ago (O'Sullivan). Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream: "I have a dream that my four

little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,

but by the content of their character." Affirmative action will never fulfill Martin Luther King

Jr.'s dream unless the program undergoes some reform. Is discrimination the solution to

resolving past discrimination? No, I don't believe so when it hurts others. Some people believe

that affirmative action is justified as a way of making up for past discrimination. Although

discrimination still exists in the United States, as it does in the rest of the world, most blacks

entering the job market today were born after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and have suffered little

prejudice when compared to their predecessors. In my opinion, affirmative action was a feeble

attempt to correct a long history of racial and sexual discrimination that seems to incite rather

than ease feelings of racial hostility.

Secondly, affirmative action promotes the hiring of less skilled workers. Affirmative action

sometimes forces employers to choose the best of the minority applicants, regardless of whether

they have the required skills, education or experience. Many colleges and universities frequently

also have quotas for how many blacks it is necessary to admit to "round out" their class

enrollments. Today's affirmative action can call for a college admissions officer faced with two

King 3

similarly qualified applicants to choose the minority over the white, or for a manager to recruit

and hire a qualified woman for a job instead of a man. "Qualified" as defined by affirmative action

means minimally qualified (Koch 66). This guideline when applied in the real world, means that

whites and Asians--no matter how economically disadvantaged or educationally deprived--may

not compete equally in programs intended for blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans and women

(Koch). Affirmative action decisions are not supposed to be based on quotas, nor are they

supposed to give any preference to unqualified candidates. The Supreme Court and other courts

have drastically reduced the scope of affirmative action, and recent polls have shown that a

majority of blacks dislike the fact that it is being used to help less qualified people get jobs,

promotions, and admission to college (Zuckerman 88). The 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Acts

explicitly banned government imposed quotas, but nevertheless, quotas immediately spread

through the economy (Brimelow and Spencer 80). In 1971 the Supreme Court ruled that

employers could be prosecuted if the racial makeup of the employees was not similar to that of

the community. "Proportional representation rather than social justice became the watchword"

(Zuckerman 88). Some people claim that whites owe blacks for what we took from them in the

past. I don't believe that society owes any compensation to blacks who are entering today's

workplace or colleges. Where should a line be drawn; how much do we do to repay people for

past wrongdoings? Is it enough to give them...

Brimelow, Peter and Spencer, Leslie. "When Quotas Replace Merit, Everybody Suffers."
Forbes 15 Feb. 1993: 80-102.

Carter, Stephen L. "Racial Justice on the Cheap." Elements of Argument Text 1997: 382-387.
Glazer, Nathan. "Race, Not Class." Elements of Argument Text 1997: 389-392.
Graglia, Lino A. "The Affirmative Action Fraud." Washington University Journal of Urban
and Contemporary Law (Summer 1998): 31-38.
Koch, Ed. "Be Fair to All the Disadvantaged." The American Enterprise (Nov/Dec 1998): 66.
O'Sullivan, John. "Preferences For (Almost) All." National Review 17 Apr. 2000: 22-24.
Zuckerman, Mortimer B. "Piling on the Preferences." US News and World Report 28 Jun.
1999: 88. You should cite this paper as follows:

MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 25 May, 2012 from
    <http://essaymania.com/95715/affirmative-action-a-need-for-reform>

More College Papers

Gangs essay
Analysis of Gangs Gangs are a violent reality that people have to deal with in today's cities. What has made these groups come about? Why do kids feel that being in a gang is both an acceptable and prestigious way to live? The long range answer to these questions can only be speculated upon

Fiery Cross essay
Gideon darted out his head like a snake, aiming for the leg of the rider just ahead. "Seas!" Jamie wrenched the big bay's head around before he could take a bite. "Evil-minded whoreson," he muttered under his breath. Adam Chisholm, unaware of his narrow escape from Gideon's teeth, caught the remar

Fetal Alcohol Syndrome essay
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is an increasing problem in our world today. At least 5,000 infants are born each year with FAS, or about one out of every 750 live births, which is an alarming number. In the United States there has been a significant increase in the rate of infants bo