Food Quality Protection Act Of 1996 H R 1627 Term paper

While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (food quality protection act of 1996 h r 1627)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!

The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (H.R. 1627)

The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 or H.R.1627 was introduced by Representative

Thomas Bliley (R) on May 12, 1996. It was supported by 243 co-sponsors. The bill was reported

to the House of Representatives after receiving an 18-0 vote in Committee of Agriculture. The

House of Representatives voted unanimously in favor of the Food Quality Protection Act of

1996. The next day the measure was considered by the Senate, and also passed with unanimous

vote. The bill was then signed by President Clinton on July 24, 1996 and become Public Law

104-170 on August 3, 1996 (Detailed Legislative History). It has been said the bill would have

died in the Senate if it had been held over just one day loner due to rapidly mounting panic and

opposition from some major players in the pesticide industry. This would been a major loss

considering Congressman Bliley had been fighting for this reform legislation since the 102nd

Congress (Sray 49 ).

The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 amends the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and

the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenicide Act that had been a burden to both growers

and consumers. The bill Requires the Environmental Protection Agency to develop uniform

standards in setting all chemical tolerances allowed in food. The Administrator of the

Environmental Protection Agency must determine if the tolerance is safe, meaning there is

reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical

residue, and any other type of exposure there is reliable information on (Sray 49). The bill

requires all pesticides to be re-registered under the guidelines that determine if they should be

used or not. The three guidelines for re-registration are the aggregate effects of a pesticide, the

common mode of toxicology, and the effects on infants and children.

The first guideline, aggregate effects of a pesticide, is the total lifetime exposure a person

will have to a chemical. This includes non-food exposure, which is something that was not

included in the past legislation. The next guideline is common mode of toxicity, which makes

the Environmental Protection Agency look at the cumulative exposure of all pesticides not just

specific ones. The last guideline is the effects of pesticides on infants and children. There are

new safety requirements that must be met regarding the amount of exposure that is safe for

infants and children (Sray 49).

Overall the Bill requires the Environmental Protection Agency to look at every chemical

used on food and determine if it is safe to use. The Bill gives incentives to chemical companies

who develop new less harmful chemicals. It also gives allowances to “minor crops” that are not

as profitable as large commodities. It allows the “minor crops” to have a longer grace period for

development and implementation of these new laws (Sray 49).

Proponents of this Bill consists of environmental groups, many children’s health

organizations, and as the voting proved all of Congress and the President. Vice President Al

Gore who has supported this bill since its beginning said the law “ brings the latest science to

the supermarket” (Waterfield C2). Gore was involved in hearings on the subject fifteen years

ago and was happy the reform Bill finally passed (WaterfieldC2).

Supporters believe the old legislation was a crisis waiting to happen, and with the new

Food Quality Protection Act children and consumers in general will be much safer. Children’s

groups are especially happy with the new focus on the level of chemical residue in many foods

that children eat. This is important because children differ in their exposure to toxic chemicals.

Children spend much of their time crawling around on the ground and putting their hands in their

mouth, therefore exposing themselves to much toxic chemicals than the average adult. In the

United States one million children are exposed to unsafe levels of pesticides in fruit, vegetables,

or baby food every year, according to a report by the Environmental Working Group (Grossfield

B1). Children also breathe differently. A one year...

Grossfield, Stan. (Putting Poisons in the Fields; Safeguarding What We Eat.) The Boston
Globe 20 September 1998:B1
Reigart, Routt. (Don’t Wait For a Crisis) The Oregonian 10 October 1998:D3
Schreiber, Alan. ”The Food Quality Protection Act: A Trojan iceberg.” Agrichemical and
Environmental News Aug. 1996:21.
Sray, Al. ”Turning Politics into Policy.” Farm Chemicals Dec. 1996:49.
United States. Library of Congress.”Detailed Legislative Status of H.R.1627.” 104th
Congress. Thomas. 20 September 1999..
Waterfield, Larry. (Bill called a boon to consumers.) The Packer 12 August 1996:C2 You should cite this paper as follows:

MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 25 May, 2012 from
    <http://essaymania.com/92097/food-quality-protection-act-of-1996-h-r-1627>

More College Papers

Death Penalty essay
Tug of War A Deep Look Into The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty Is the death penalty fair? Is it humane? Does it deter crime? The answers to these questions vary depending on who answers them. The issue of capital punishment raises many debates. These same questions troubled Americans j

Food Quality essay
The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (H.R. 1627) The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 or H.R.1627 was introduced by Representative Thomas Bliley (R) on May 12, 1996. It was supported by 243 co-sponsors. The bill was reported to the House of Representatives after receiving an 18-0 vote in C

American Revolution essay
Jaime Feal American History Essay Among the many complex factors that contributed to instigating the American Revolution, two stand out most clearly: England’s imposition of taxation on the colonies and the failure of the British to gain consent of those being governed, along with the military