Food Quality Term paper
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (food quality)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (H.R. 1627)
The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 or H.R.1627 was introduced by Representative
Thomas Bliley (R) on May 12, 1996. It was supported by 243 co-sponsors. The bill was reported
to the House of Representatives after receiving an 18-0 vote in Committee of Agriculture. The
House of Representatives voted unanimously in favor of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996.
The next day the measure was considered by the Senate, and also passed with unanimous vote.
The bill was then signed by President Clinton on July 24, 1996 and become Public Law 104-170
on August 3, 1996 (Detailed Legislative History). It has been said the bill would have died in the
Senate if it had been held over just one day loner due to rapidly mounting panic and opposition
from some major players in the pesticide industry. This would been a major loss considering
Congressman Bliley had been fighting for this reform legislation since the 102nd Congress (Sray
49 ).
The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 amends the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenicide Act that had been a burden to both growers and
consumers. The bill Requires the Environmental Protection Agency to develop uniform standards
in setting all chemical tolerances allowed in food. The Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency must determine if the tolerance is safe, meaning there is reasonable certainty
that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, and any other
type of exposure there is reliable information on (Sray 49). The bill requires all pesticides to be
re-registered under the guidelines that determine if they should be used or not. The three
guidelines for re-registration are the aggregate effects of a pesticide, the common mode of
toxicology, and the effects on infants and children.
The first guideline, aggregate effects of a pesticide, is the total lifetime exposure a person
will have to a chemical. This includes non-food exposure, which is something that was not
included in the past legislation. The next guideline is common mode of toxicity, which makes the
Environmental Protection Agency look at the cumulative exposure of all pesticides not just specific
ones. The last guideline is the effects of pesticides on infants and children. There are new safety
requirements that must be met regarding the amount of exposure that is safe for infants and
children (Sray 49).
Overall the Bill requires the Environmental Protection Agency to look at every chemical
used on food and determine if it is safe to use. The Bill gives incentives to chemical companies
who develop new less harmful chemicals. It also gives allowances to “minor crops” that are not as
profitable as large commodities. It allows the “minor crops” to have a longer grace period for
development and implementation of these new laws (Sray 49).
Proponents of this Bill consists of environmental groups, many children’s health
organizations, and as the voting proved all of Congress and the President. Vice President Al Gore
who has supported this bill since its beginning said the law “ brings the latest science to the
supermarket” (Waterfield C2). Gore was involved in hearings on the subject fifteen years ago and
was happy the reform Bill finally passed (WaterfieldC2).
Supporters believe the old legislation was a crisis waiting to happen, and with the new
Food Quality Protection Act children and consumers in general will be much safer. Children’s
groups are especially happy with the new focus on the level of chemical residue in many foods that
children eat. This is important because children differ in their exposure to toxic chemicals.
Children spend much of their time crawling around on the ground and putting their hands in their
mouth, therefore exposing themselves to much toxic chemicals than the average adult. In the
United States one million children are exposed to unsafe levels of pesticides in fruit, vegetables, or
baby food every year, according to a report by the Environmental Working Group (Grossfield B1).
Children also breathe differently. A one...
Grossfield, Stan. (Putting Poisons in the Fields; Safeguarding What We Eat.) The BostonGlobe 20 September 1998:B1
Reigart, Routt. (Don’t Wait For a Crisis) The Oregonian 10 October 1998:D3
Schreiber, Alan. ”The Food Quality Protection Act: A Trojan iceberg.” Agrichemical and
Environmental News Aug. 1996:21.
Sray, Al. ”Turning Politics into Policy.” Farm Chemicals Dec. 1996:49.
United States. Library of Congress.”Detailed Legislative Status of H.R.1627.” 104th
Congress. Thomas. 20 September 1999..
Waterfield, Larry. (Bill called a boon to consumers.) The Packer 12 August 1996:C2
MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 25 May, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/92095/food-quality>
More College Papers
American Revolution essay
Jaime Feal American History Essay Among the many complex factors that contributed to instigating the American Revolution, two stand out most clearly: England’s imposition of taxation on the colonies and the failure of the British to gain consent of those being governed, along with the military
Affirmative Action essay
Affirmative Action
Affirmative Action efforts were started in 1964 to end the long history of
overlooking qualified people of color and women from higher education. Affirmative
Action sets standards for a business or office of admissions, so that a white man does not
have the upper-hand over an
Frederick Douglas's "What To The Slave Is The 4Th Of July" V. Justice Taney In Dred Scott Ruling essay
In the years leading to the U.S. Civil War, the controversy over slavery became
not only a social issue, but also a political and legal one as well. Opponents and
proponents of slavery each looked to the American constitution, as well as the prevailing
culture of the time, for direction in dea
