Frederick Douglas S What To The Slave Is The 4th Of July V Justice Taney In Dred Scott Ruling Essay
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (frederick douglas s what to the slave is the 4th of july v justice taney in dred scott ruling)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
In the years leading to the U.S. Civil War, the controversy over slavery became
not only a social issue, but also a political and legal one as well. Opponents and
proponents of slavery each looked to the American constitution, as well as the prevailing
culture of the time, for direction in dealing with this matter. Two such people who based
their landmark works on this were Justine Taney of the U.S. Supreme Court, and
Frederick Douglas, an emancipated slave, who fought tirelessly for the abolishment of
slavery.
In 1852, Frederick Douglas was asked to speak at a July 4th celebration. In his
speech, he made it known clearly, his detestment for the treatment of Black slaves of the
day, as well as the irony and hypocracy, that was especially evident on that day. He
explained that this hypocracy aimed at the black population was evident on several fronts,
and so, he refers to the fourth of July as “ the birthday of your National Independence and
your political freedom.”
However, Frederick Douglas never lost hope. Although in his speeches and
writing he aludes greatly to the detestable and horrid facts black enslavement, he
nonetheless saw a silver lining. “There is hope in the thought,” Douglas said, after he
explicated how America is a new and young nation, despite it being around the “old age
for a man”. Since the United States was recently formed, there is still plenty of room for
reform and changes that would not have been possible had America been older.
America, he said, was still in the “impressible stage of her existance.”
As bleak and grim as the conditions were for blacks at the time, was nonetheless
optimistic about the idea that blacks will one day be accepted and absorbed in all the
ranks of society. He likened this to the analogy of rivers, which, he said, were like
nations. Even though a river can not be turned aside, “it may dry up”. If a nation “dries
up”, there will be nohing left of that nation, except a “withered branch”. This withered
branch is a symbol of what the nation believed in and what could happen to it if it
unfairly cast aside certain members of its society.
Douglas also pointed out that the Declaration of Independence was one of the
most valuable factors in the Nation’s destiny. The principles written in the Declaration of
Independence should be kept and adhered to. “Be true to to them on all occasions”, wrote
Douglas. He believed that most documents that were written after the Declaration of
Independence didn’t follow the significant ideology set forth in the Declaration of
Independence. Douglas wants to use the Constitution, but without the pro-slavery clause
in it.
In stark contrast to this, Justice Taney, who wrote the majority opinion of the
court in the case of Dred Scott V. Sandford, dealt a major blow to the work of Frederick
Douglas. In his opinion, Justice Taney uses the same reference points as Frederick
Douglas, only to twist it, and give it a pro-slavery slant.
Like Frederick Douglas, Justice Taney too makes mention of the Declaration of
Independence, but in this case, to prove that blacks were never intended to maintain full
legal citizen status here in the United States. This in itself was a very significant
statement, being that the Declaration of Independence, for all intent and purposes, is not a
legal document, and so, it is hardly ever used as a reference point in the courts. It seems
almost as though Justice Taney was speaking directly Frederick Douglas on this matter.
Justice Taney, in ruling on the question of black citizenship, not only dismisses
the idea of blacks as legal citizens, but also that human beings. He bases this ruling on the
letter of the law, but rather on the spirit of the law. Meaning, that since the birth of this
country, although not written explicitly, though nonetheless obvious, that blacks were
never intended to become citizens of this country. This was the very same hypocracy that
Frederick Douglas made mention to in his writings.
Justice Taney’s view of blacks as a sub-human race, or in legal terminology, as
property, was the essence of his reasoning in striking down the Missouri Compromise.
His decision illustrated that he didn’t...
MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 25 May, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/92092/frederick-douglas-s-what-to-the-slave-is-the-4th-of-july-v-justice-taney-in-dred-scott-ruling>
More College Papers
Economical And Political Elite - Corporations essay
The global economy has become like a malignant cancer, advancing the colonization of the planet's living spaces for the benefit of powerful corporations and financial institutions. It has turned these once useful institutions into instruments of a market tyranny that is destroying livelihoods, displ
Nafta essay
NAFTA: Calculating the Costs
Effective on January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) was enacted as a new dream, one designed to enhance the economies
and production of goods for the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Since its
conception, it was, and still remains today a
Bolivia Research Paper essay
Outline Bolivia
Introduction:
I. The History of Bolivia
A. Independence
1. Revolution
B. Political Instability
1. The Regime of Paz Estenssoro
2. Rule by the Army
II. The Economy
A. Resources
1. Mining, Manufacture, and Trade
2. Agriculture, Fishing, and Forestry
B. Strengths and Weakn