Term paper on Does The Mass Media Cause Undesireable Social

Free Does The Mass Media Cause Undesireable Social papers

Epistemology
Plato’s View in Human Knowledge Plato presents three different views about knowledge in Meno, Republic, and Theaetetus. In Meno’s case, Plato believes knowledge as something innate in us when we are born; in his later view, in Republic, Plato believes we perceive things and gain knowled

Ethics On Abortion
Abortion from an ethical point of view “ Describe and evaluate any two contrasting theoretical approaches to the moral debate of abortion.” * * * It is widely accepted that the fact of abortion has been a subject of conversation and controversy for many decades. Since the proportion of

Does the mass media cause undesireable social

consequences with specific reference to

pornography

It started by way of messengers and scribes, evolved through the presentation of

newspapers and radio, brought us together with television, and now serves us

world-wide via the ever-popular Internet. It is the mass media, and even from the

earliest days of its existence, it has contributed greatly in ways that both enlighten

and enrich society, and ways that deteriorate and perplex it. It is not a surprise to

learn, then, that the mass media is the most powerful source of information we

have, and nothing else in today’s world influences public perception quite as

heavily.

Unfortunately, however, most of what is broadcast or transmitted in the news

today is with reference to the chaotic condition of our planet, or something else

that society as a whole sees as detrimental or damaging. But the news on television

is not the only type of media taking the criticism of society. Other forms of mass

media, specifically movies and television programs containing pornography and

violence have been heavily criticized. The underlining concept to be debated here

is that society is negatively influenced, specifically, by these images of pornography

and the result is increased violence against women. This assumption, and it is

indeed only an assumption, is completely fallacious, however, as no concrete and

completely conclusive evidence has ever been formulated in support of the theory.

The key premise here is that the mass media does not cause undesirable social

behaviour and in actuality, the media people should not be dubbed as the “bad

guys”. They simply use their power in the most constructive ways possible in order

to promote their ratings and popularity. One way to do that is to concentrate on

what sells: sex, violence and disaster.

Having said this, why is it then, that many in society still believe otherwise; why do

they continue to believe that pornography is “evil” and is a major cause for

violence against women, specifically rape? There are many reasons for this

misinterpretation and through the following few points, an attempt will be made to

show that pornography has very little to almost no correlation with violence against

women (of course nothing is “absolute” in society). In order to demonstrate this, it

must be made evident that pornography is not “evil” and does not cause

undesirable social behaviour by displaying nude women in sexually explicit

circumstances. Thus, it is important to indicate that women are not treated only as

sexual objects through the media. This is done in an attempt to quash any traces of

“evil” in pornography. Subsequently, a second point, that some may consider to be

completely bizarre, can be addressed; that pornography actually reduces the

amount of violence against women.

For thousands of years, sex itself has been considered “evil” and revolting. This is

exactly why the concealment of the sex organs and teaching feelings of shame

toward human sexuality is so common worldwide (Christensen 1990:4). These

same feelings of shame are the chief reasons that sex is considered a personal and

private matter. Contrary to the beliefs of many, the mass media did not create

these settings; society creates this image. In some societies, women have no

reservations with regard to living their entire lives completely naked, while in other

societies, females cover themselves from head to toe, only revealing their eyes. The

media has been bombarded with criticism, overwhelmingly from the female

community, relative to the amount of sexually explicit material that is published in

magazines and that appears on television and in the cinemas. A common argument

against pornography is that the media portrays women as being nothing more than

sexual playthings and objects to satisfy male sexual desires. As before, the media

once again, is not to be held responsible for creating this image; these views are

products of society.

It would be downright absurd to assume that women in this society are treated as

sexual objects only because the media releases or broadcasts pornographic

material. A magazine associated with make-up and skin care, for example, will

quite obviously not be concentrating on much else. Such a magazine would not

display pictures of women who mountain-climb or women who water-ski; only

images of make-up and text referring to skin care would be relevant. Clearly,

society does not consider women to be beings who’s only purpose in life is to

worry about make-up and skin care; but why are the complaints only directed

towards pornographic media then? The answer to this question may be more

complicated, however, what remains obvious is that the media does not portray

women as only being able to fill male sexual desires. To say that pictures featuring

nudity, etc, are making objects out of women is foolish. One should consider

females who pin-up posters of male rock stars or children who collect hockey or

baseball cards. Society, however, does not say that objects are being made out of

these rock stars and sports heroes; pictures of clothed people are no less objects

than pictures of naked people.

Many complaints are also made to the effect that pornography only offers a one-

dimensional view to life; that women are seen as nymphomaniacs who are

hysterically addicted to sex. It should be pointed out that events such as hockey

games, boxing matches, horse races and operas all offer a one-dimensional view of

life. One does not attend an opera hoping to see a horse race. The underling

problem here is that the above mentioned events are socially acceptable; media

displaying pornography is not. It is also said that the media reduces women to a

collection of body parts through pornography (Christensen 1990:74). But why

then are their no complaints of advertisements in magazines displaying only ears,

for example, or a nose, or feet? The reason is a simple one; society considers

certain body parts to be “shameful” or disgusting and once again, the media can be

“let off the hook”.

Realistically, the only way to prevent women from being seen as sex objects is for

them to be seen as other things as well; but to say that women are not sexual

beings would be misleading because both men and women are very much sexual

(Christensen 1990:42). Similarly, to say that women are singled out in the media is

fallacious due to the many examples of media where men are seen catering to the

needs of women; something known as chivralic sexism (Christensen 1990:42).

Take, for instance, a recent television ad portraying young men groveling at the feet

of supermodel Cindy Crawford, almost begging to be the “one” to cater to her

needs. There were no lineups of men aching to announce their displeasure with the

sexist ad; and this is precisely why male stereotyping in the media often goes

unnoticed. Similarly, it is pornography in the media that is noticed and shunned by

anti-pornographic and censorship organizations because it seemingly singles out

females for their bodies. It should be well noted, however, that paperback

romance novels, which make up an incredible 40% of total paperback sales

(Gerbner 1988:15), depicts males as sexual objects, performing what is called

“Sweet Savagery” (rape), just as pornography depicts females as sexual objects.

But once again, this goes unnoticed.

It is fundamentally important to realize that the media does not deliberately create

images of hate or disagreement (Howitt, Cumberbatch 1975:80). They just

influence the more appealing things in society (thus directly increasing their ratings).

Although it is obvious that pornography is largely a male interest, a noted increase

in female interest would certainly cause an increase in the amount of pornographic

material geared for women; this relates to the laws of the business world

(Christensen 1990:50).

Having discussed the untruthfulness of the claims against pornography and showing

that pornography is not “evil”, it is now possible to consider the violence issue. Are

men who are exposed to pornography likely to commit violent acts, such as rape

against women, more so than men who are not exposed to pornography? It is

tempting to believe that media influences males and overstimulates them through

pornography to the point that they become aggressive towards females. But this is

completely baseless; just as pornography arouses or stimulates, it also...

You should cite this paper as follows:

MLA Style
Does The Mass Media Cause Undesireable Social. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 18 Mar, 2010 from
    <http://essaymania.com/91103/does-the-mass-media-cause-undesireable-social>