Term paper on An Argument Against Gun Control

Free An Argument Against Gun Control papers

"Revelation" By Flannery O'connor
The story opens with Ruby Turpin entering a doctor's waiting room with her husband Claud who has been kicked by a cow. As she and Claud wait, she takes hard stock of the other people in the room. There was some white-trash, a "red- headed youngish woman" who was not white-trash, just common, a we

The Evolution Of Hukleberry Finn
The Evolution of Huckleberry Finn “It was easier to recognize the traits that Twain was contemptuous of, since the entire book was supposed to satirize society. But there were certain traits that Twain admired, too.” (3) Twain showed that he admired morality in The Adventures of Huckleb

An Argument Against Gun Control

As long ago as 1789, the creators of the Constitution realized the importance of guns in

American society. The Second Amendment states,"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to

the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

No loopholes, or legal caches exist in this statement. The Founding Fathers allow for no

restriction of the private ownership of firearms. Yet, in recent years anti-gun politicians have

attempted to control guns in the name of crime prevention. Gun control makes no effort to

control criminals, does not reduce crime, takes guns from responsible sportsmen and recreational

shooters, and allows criminals to possess firearms superior to those of the public.

Advocates that support the cause of control claim that controlling firearms will lesson

criminal action. Gun control does nothing to control criminals. The fundamental flaw in the

thinking of anti-gun polititions is that guns don't kill people. People kill people. The same logic

that leads one to control firearms could also lead one to endeavor to control automobiles and fast

food simply because they are instrumental in millions of deaths per year. Why when Americans

reject such an absurd theory as "Automobile Control," which do not infringe the constitution,.

would these same individuals embrace an idea as gun control? People accept gun control, but if

a politician would suggest "controlling" fast food restaurants because the fatty food causes heart

problems and deaths, the public would scorn his insane proposal. Ultimately, people's choices

lead them to drive recklessly, overindulge in unhealthy food, and use firearms to commit violent

crimes. So, criminals should be controlled, not the guns which they share with millions of

law-abiding citizens.

Gun control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate. Gun control does

nothing to reduce crime. A study conducted by the Urban Institute regarding The Clinton Gun

Ban Law of 1995, finds that "because the banned guns and magazines were never used in more

than a fraction of all gun murders, even the maximum theoretically achievable preventive effect

of the ban on gun murders is almost certainly too small to detect statistically..." Joseph

Constance, the Deputy Police Chief of Trenton, New Jersey, states: "Assault weapons are used in

an underwhelming .026 of 1% of crimes in New...