Essay on Interpreting The Text Of The Constitution
Interpreting The Text Of The Constitution Term Papers
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (interpreting the text of the constitution)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
The United States Constitution defines the laws of the land as the Constitution itself and those laws or legal documents that are constitutionally passed through legislature. The role of upholding these laws and interpreting them in cases are assigned to the judicial branch. Our judicial system is to be one that follows common law, so ultimately laws do come from courts. Although the Supreme Court essentially has final say, the Constitution does not grant it the power of forming laws by a majority vote out of nine justices. These laws formed by court decisions should be based on the text of the Constitution and legislative laws and in times of ambiguity original intent of these legal texts should be used. The impact of these decisions has on society should not be from a new law formed but should be from having more clarity on application of the Constitution to laws.
Although there is much debate as to what should govern justices of the Supreme Court in their decisions, we cannot ignore that the Constitution clearly defines that it is the role of the justices to interpret the law and only that. Making the laws that are not covered in the Constitution are left to the federal and state legislatures. It is beyond my belief that anyone can argue that they believe the framers of the Constitution entrusted nine justices of the Supreme Court to make decisions that will affect all of the nation using their own moral philosophy.
After fighting so hard to gain our independence, I am sure that the original intent for the justices of the Supreme Court were to ensure that the basic natural rights that were so hard earned and clearly defined in the Constitution are to be the only jurisdiction of the individuals of the Supreme Court. By stating that something is constitutional or unconstitutional there will ultimately be effects that justices must take into consideration before their decisions. These effects must not conflict or go beyond the original intent of the Constitution.
Justice William Brennan argues that the death penalty “is under all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment.” Interpretations of words can lead to such reasoning but original intent is completely ignored in its application. Brennan argues this point despite the fact that the death penalty has been around since the founding of these amendments. Perhaps our values have progressed since the Constitution but through proper legislation, our laws have and will continue to progress along with the values of our nation. We do not need to result to judicial activism taken at the bench to guide our society on what may seem to be the right path.
These forms of judicial activism takes the words of the Constitution and other forms of law and gives new meaning to them with the blatant disregard for the original intent. Although it can be argued that original intent is hard to define, then it should be the practice of justices to use what is clearly seen as original intent, all else should not be decided by the justices of the Supreme Court.
Justices cannot base their decisions on what they believed to be the moral philosophies of the framers or what they believe were the very values that the Constitution was framed on. Great philosophical minds would not be able to agree on a set of moral values that they believe to be consistent with all the framers. Justices are limited to protecting the rights defined and deciding whether something is constitutional or unconstitutional. In deciding that a law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court is stating that the law is violating things defined in the Constitution and that their interpretation is consistent with the original intent of the words or phrased used in the Constitution.
In the case Roe v. Wade, the justices erred in declaring that the abortion statutes of the state of Texas were unconstitutional. It based its decision on interpretations of the Ninth Amendment, through the Fourteenth Amendment. Though I believe that the right to having abortions is a right our society...
Can Den Haag, Ernest. “Not Above the Law.” National Review. National Review Inc., Oct. 7, 1991.Hadley, Arkes. “Lincoln, Nietzsche, and the Constitution.” First Things. April 200.Scalia, Antonin. “For Lawyers Only: ‘A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the law.’” The Law and Politics Book Review. Denton, Texas.1997.Roe v. Wade, Supreme Court of the United States, 410 U.S. 959; 93 S. Ct. 1409; 1973 U.S. LEXIS 3282; 35 L. Ed. 2d 694, Feb. 26, 1973.Sikkenga, Jeffrey. “Lest we Forget: Clarence Thomas and the Meaning of the Constitution.” On Principle. Ashland University, Dec. 1998.Troy, Daniel E. “The Court’s Mr. Right.” National Review. August 9, 1999.MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 12 Feb, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/7618/interpreting-the-text-of-the-constitution>
More College Papers
Internet Regulation
The Internet is a method of communication and a source
of information that is becoming more popular among those who
are interested in, and have the time to surf the information
superhighway. The problem with this much information being
accessible to this many people is that some of it i
Inequality in the Legal System
In the United States, true equality has never existed. From the
Declaration of Independence to modern times, the US legal system has failed at
any attempt at equality. ‘...all men are created equal...’ may be what the
Declaration says, but ‘some men are more equal than others’ is how the leg
Immigration in the U.S
This country is overwhelmed with illegal immigrants. The
number of Mexicans that cross over the border grows every day.
This is a serious strain on our economy. Today's society can not
partake in the addition of these immigrants.
The definition of society states: A population living in