Media Disgrace Term paper
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (media disgrace)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
More coverage than O.J. More coverage than Diana. More than Oklahoma City, and more coverage than even Monica Lewinsky. You guessed it, Election 2000, and the media loved every minute of it. Savoring the proverbial field-day, U.S. journalists greatly assisted in dividing the country, destroying the people’s respect for the American legal system, embarrassing the world’s superpower, and simply annoying the crap out of everyone. To put it simply, the media didn’t do it’s job, especially when it came to the really focal points of the recent election: pre-election coverage, election-night coverage, and post-election coverage including the Florida recount.
In order to obtain more ground to cover, the media started off by telling the people just how different the two major candidates were (always relishing partisanship), when in truth, they aren’t that polarized. Of course, they have vaguely different views on how to accomplish certain goals, but for the most part, those goals are the same. It’s the usual, strengthen our economy, preserve social security, improve education, yada yada yada; the candidates just occasionally differ on how to do so -- leading to an enduring joke about the American people not really wanting either candidate.
The candidate’s are also similar in that they both exaggerated and skirted around lying in pre-election campaigning. The media compounded these problems by not being able to decide whether to be responsible enough to analyze these campaign claims and when they half-heartedly made any attempts they were often off the mark. Unfortunately, we a tendency to remember the few hits and forget the innumerable misses. For example, the media showed a keen interest in Gore's recounting the story of a Sarasota, Florida student who was forced to stand in her science class due to overcrowding. While many reports chalked it up as another Gore embellishment, few journalists acknowledged that the story was essentially accurate, and could have been easily confirmed through a local newspaper. In contrast, the media seem less interested in Gore's distortions when they are directly connected to public policy issues. During the second debate, Gore claimed that "for 24 years I have never been afraid to take on the big drug companies." In fact, one of the first major issues of the campaign involved Gore's efforts on behalf of drug companies to get South Africa to stop manufacturing affordable versions of patented AIDS drugs-- a life-saving move that is allowed under international trade laws, but would have threatened pharmaceutical industry profits. In contrast, media seemed uninterested in Bush's distortions across the board, whether the issue was Bush's personal record or important policy matters. In the second debate, Bush claimed that "We spend $4.7 billion a year on the uninsured in the state of Texas." But "we" turns out not to mean his state government-- it means anyone within the boundaries of Texas, including federal government officials. The state of Texas actually spends less than $1 billion on the uninsured, with the rest of Bush's figure coming from private, local and federal spending. Also not caught by the media, the discrepancy of Bush touting his support for a patients' bill of rights in the third debate. Bush said: "As a matter of fact, I brought Republicans and Democrats together to do just that in the state of Texas, to get a patients' bill of rights through." In fact, Governor Bush vetoed the Patients' Bill of Rights the Texas State Legislature passed in 1995. When it was passed again in 1997, the bill's support was strong enough to withstand his threatened veto.
Moreover, of course, neither Gore or Bush is trustworthy-- in the sense that their statements should not be taken on trust, but the media failed to take note of that when reporting campaign claims. Nor should reporters accept what candidates say without doing the essential journalistic task of checking the facts. But all too often, media behave as though applying skepticism to a politician's words is something that one does only in unusual circumstances. This pre-election irresponsibility threw everything off-kilter and, simply, it got even worse.
In a performance that will live in journalistic infamy, television’s most famous news personalities subjected the nation to an emotional, unnecessary, and irresponsible roller coaster ride election day. The farce that unfolded on television on election night revealed that, as much as the networks may try to pitch themselves as experienced and professional news organizations, they are anything but. Early Tuesday evening, Dan Rather invited...
MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 25 May, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/68141/media-disgrace>
More College Papers
Media essay
Media Awareness
The case that I decided to focus on is an older abuse case, but it has recently been
resolved in the courts. It is a child abuse case involving James and Bonnie Zeleski. They
were both charged with abusing their infant daughter. The child was brought to the
hospital with a fractu
Gender Stereotypes In Advertising essay
Gender Stereotypes In Advertising
Have you ever thought about the way that you feel after you see a really funny commercial, or a commercial that shocks you to the point where you know your going to think about it for the rest of the day? By simply stating the name of a specific company, is it poss
Meat Facorties From The 1920S (The Jungle) essay
Meat Factories! How Disgusting!
Meat factories have been recently under sedge because of how things are done. The whole ordeal started with the unionsÂ’ workers strike for more pay. From there this situation just got worse. Labor spies had been infiltrated into the union, meaning that the executives