Essay on Morality And Practicality Of Euthanasia
Morality And Practicality Of Euthanasia Term Papers
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (morality and practicality of euthanasia)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
Morality and Practicality of Euthanasia
Euthanasia is defined by The American Heritage Dictionary as "the action of killing
an individual for reasons considered to be merciful" (Leonesio 292). Here, killing is
described as the physical action where one individual actively kills another. Euthanasia is
tolerated in the medical field under certain circumstances when a patient is suffering
profoundly and death is inevitable. The word "euthanasia" comes from the Greek eu,
"good", and thanatos, "death," literally, "good death"; however, the word "euthanasia" is
much more difficult to define. Each person may define euthanasia differently. Who is to
decide whether a death is good or not? It is generally taken today to mean that act which a
health care professional carries out to help his/her patient achieve a good death. While
growing up, each of us learns a large number of rules of conduct. Which rules we learn
will depend on the kind of society we live in and the parents and the friends we have.
Sometimes we learn a rule without understanding its point. In most cases this may work
out, for the rule may be designed to cover ordinary circumstances, but when faced with
unusual situations, we may be in trouble. This situation is the same with moral rules.
Without understanding the rules, we may come to think of it as a mark of virtue that we
will not consider making exceptions to. We need a way of understanding the morality
against killing. The point is not to preserve every living thing possible, but to protect the
interests of individuals to have the right of choice to die.
Firstly, there are ethical guidelines for euthanasia. If the following guidelines are met,
then euthanasia is considered acceptable. The person must be a mature adult. This is
essential. The exact age will depend on the individual but the person should not be a minor
who would come under quite different laws. Secondly, the person must have clearly made
a considered decision. An individual has the ability now to indicate this with a living will
(which applies only to disconnection of life supports) and can also, in today's more open
and tolerant society, freely discuss the option of euthanasia with health-care professionals,
family, lawyers, etc. The euthanasia must not be carried out at the first knowledge of a
life-threatening illness, and reasonable medical help must have been sought to cure or at
least slow down the terminal disease. It is when the fight is clearly hopeless and the agony,
physical and mental, is unbearable that a final exit is an option. The treating physician must
have been informed, asked to be involved, and his or her response been taken into
account. The physician's response will vary depending on the circumstances, of course, but
they should advise their patients that a rational suicide is not a crime. It is best to inform
the doctor and hear his or her response. For example, the patient might be mistaken.
Perhaps the diagnosis has been misheard or misunderstood. Patients raising this subject
were met with a discreet silence or meaningless remarks in the past but in today's more
accepting climate most physicians will discuss potential end of life actions. The person
must have a Will disposing of his or her worldly effects and money. ( Docker)
This shows evidence of a tidy mind, an orderly life, and forethought, all things which
are important to an acceptance of rational suicide. The person must have made plans to
die that do not involve others in criminal liability or leave them with guilty feelings.
Assistance in suicide is a crime in most places, although the laws are gradually changing,
and very few cases ever come before the courts. The only well known instance of a
lawsuit concerning this is the doctor-assisted suicide of Dr. Kevorkian. The person must
leave a note saying exactly why he or she is taking their life. This statement in writing
removes the chance of misunderstandings or blame. It also demonstrates that the
departing person is taking full responsibility for the action. These are all guidelines for
allowing a euthanasia to take place. By this, I mean the doctor is involved in the patient's
decision and actively performs the euthanasia.
The common argument in support of euthanasia is one that is called "The argument
of mercy." Patients sometimes suffer pain that can hardly be comprehended by those who
have not experienced it. The suffering would be so terrible that people wouldn't want to
read or think about; and recoil in horror from its description. The argument for mercy
simply states: Euthanasia is morally justified because it ends suffering. Terminally ill
patients are people who will never attain a personal existence, never experience life as a
net value, and/or never achieve a minimal level of independence. The moral issue
regarding euthanasia is not affected by whether more could have been done for a patient;
but whether euthanasia is allowable if it is the only alternative to torment.
Courts and moral philosophers alike have long accepted the proposition that people
have a right to refuse medical treatment they find painful or difficult to bear, even if that
refusal means certain death. Individuals have the right to decide about their own lives and
deaths. What more basic right is there than to decide if you're going to live? There is
none. A person under a death sentence who's being kept alive, through so called heroic
measures certainly has a fundamental right to say, "Enough's enough. The treatment's
worse than the disease. Leave me alone. Let me die!". Ironically, those who deny the
terminally ill this right do so out of a sense of high morality. Don't they see that, in denying
the gravely ill and suffering the right to release themselves from pain, they commit the
greatest crime? (Burnell)
Are there no conditions when life is meaningless and should be quietly ended? If a
person is subject to pain that won't stop as a result of a disease that can't be cured, must
he or she suffer that pain as long as possible when there are gentle ways of putting an end
to life? If a person suffers from a disease that deprives him or her of all memory and
makes him or her a helpless lump of flesh that may live on for years.
We spend more than a billion dollars a day for health car while our teachers are
underpaid, and our industrial plants are rusty. This should not continue. There is
something fundamentally unsustainable about a society that moves its basic value
producing industries overseas yet continues to manufacture artificial hearts at home. We
have money to give smokers heart transplants but no money to retool out steel mills. We
train more doctors and lawyers than we need but fewer teachers. On any given day, 30 to
40 percent of the hospital beds in America are empty, but our classrooms are overcrowded
and our transportation systems are deteriorating. We are great at treating sick people, but
we are not that great at treating a sick economy. And we are not succeeding in
international trade. When you really look around and try to find industries the United
States is succeeding in, you discover that they are very few and far between. (Docker)
The period of suffering can be shortened. If you have ever been in a terminal cancer
ward, It's grim but enlightening. Anyone who's been there can know how much people can
suffer before they die. And not just physically. The emotional, even spiritual, agony is
often worse. Today our medical hardware is...
MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 12 Feb, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/64252/morality-and-practicality-of-euthanasia>
More College Papers
Aids
Aids by sean ross
How is HIV Diagnosed?
You can get tested for HIV in a number of locations -- including public clinics, AIDS organizations, physicians' offices, and hospitals. Many locations give the test for free. You can choose between anonymous tests, in which you do not give your name to th
Multiple Causation Theory Of Leukemia
Leukemia is a malignant disease of the bone marrow and blood. It is characterized by the uncontrolled growth of blood cells. The term leukemia has a Latin derivation. Leuko means white and heme is blood. Therefore the word leukemia literally means white blood. The common types of leukemia are divide
Tetanus
Tetanus
Tetanus is a serious, sometimes fatal, disease caused by the
infection of a puncture wound in the skin by spores containing
the bacterium, Clostridium tetani. These bacterial spores are
commonly found in soil, animal excrement, house dust, operating
rooms, contaminated heroin, and most