Liberalism Essay

While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (liberalism)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!

Differences and Similarities of Liberalism



The purpose of this paper is to treat the similarly and differences of

liberalism. I will use John Locke and Adam Smith to represent classical

liberals. John Stuart Mill and John Maynard Keynes will be used to show

contemporary liberals.


John Locke


In John Locke's Second Treatise of Government he develops a theory of

government as a product of a social contract, which when broken justifies the

creation of a new government for the protection of life, liberty and property.

He begins his argument by developing a theory of the state of nature which is


...what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of

perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their

possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds

of the law of nature, without asking leave or depending upon

the will of any other man.1


The state of nature includes the “...law of nature to govern it, which obliges

everyone; and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but

consult it...”2 The state of nature also includes inequality


...since gold and silver, being little useful to the life of a

man in proportion to food, raiment, and carriage, has its value

only from the consent of men, whereof labour yet makes, in

great part, the measure, it is plain that men have agreed to a

disproportional and unequal possession of the earth.3


In Locke's state on nature there are also three distinct problems. First

there is no established settled known law. As each man consults his own law of

nature he receives a slightly different interpretation.

Secondly there no known and indifferent judge. Which creates the

problem of trying to decide which is the correct law of nature which will be

followed in an impartial manor.

Thirdly there is insufficient force of execution. This is the problem

of how to carry out the decision of the law of nature on another when he has a

different interpretation or doesn't consult the law of nature.

Locke states that the three problems in the state of nature would be

best solved by coming together to form a new government to protect there

property.


The great and chief end therefore, of men's coming into commonwealths,

and putting themselves under government, is the preservation of their

property...4


And goes further into what this new government should be empowered to do


firstly...established, settled known law, received and allowed by

common consent to be the standard of right and wrong, and the

common measure to decide all controversies between them...

secondly...there wants a known and indifferent judge, with

authority to determine all differences according to the

established law...thirdly...There often wants power to back

and support the sentence when right, and to give it due execution.

They who by any injustice offend, will seldom fail, where they

are able, by force to make good their injustice...5


In Locke's government men only give up the right to the above mentioned

things, to create the law for themselves, to judge the law for themselves, and

to execute the law for themselves. These are the only rights that the

government has the right to interfere in as it is the only reason that people

entered into a commonwealth. Locke also explains the new social contract that

the new government should operate under. The first point of the contract is

that the people agree to form a body politic, in which the majority rule.

Second the body politic selects a government of the day. (elects people on a

regular basis to the government to legislate the law)

Locke laid out who should be allowed the right to vote, who shouldn't be

allowed to vote and gives his reason why.


...all men as members for the purposes of being ruled and only men

of estate as members for the prepossess of ruling. The right to

rule (more accurately, the right to control any government) is

given to the men of estate only: it is they who are given the

decisive voice about taxation, without which no government can

subsist. On the other hand, the obligation to be bound by law

and subject to the lawful government is fixed on all men whether

or not they have property in the sense of estate, and indeed

whether or not they have made an express compact.6


Johns Stuart Mill


There is no difficulty in showing that the ideally best form of

government is that

in which the sovereignty, or supreme controlling power in the last

resort, is

vested in the entire aggregate of the community.7

It is with this statement that Mill begins his augment in The Ideally

Best Polity showing his believe in Locke's democracy but saying that all people

could be best served by the government if everyone could vote. As this is the

only way the government learns what it needs to know in order to govern. He

comes to this concussion by saying that participatory democracy is the best

answer to the two questions that he poses as to what makes a good government.


...namely how far it promotes the good management of the affairs

of society by means of the existing faculties, moral, intellectual,

and active, of its various members, and what effect in improving or

deteriorating those faculties.8


Mill believes that it is necessary to expand the role of government not

only to protect the people from the government but to promote liberty by putting

limits on what can be expressed as public opinion against a minority, and to

involve people in the government so as to give them stimulation and help them

develop.

In Mill's writings he also discuses the idea of liberty and what limits

government and public opinion should have on interfering with a...

The rest of the paper is available free of charge to our registered users. The registration process just couldn't be easier. Log in or register now. It is all free!
You should cite this paper as follows:

MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 25 May, 2012 from
    <http://essaymania.com/3766/liberalism>

More College Papers

Hutu and Tutsi Tribes In Rwanda: Anarchy essay
The Hutu and Tutsi Tribes In Rwanda The Hutu and Tutsi's tribes of Rwanda have been at war for centuries. The fighting began 5 centuries ago when the Tutsi a warrior tribe of Hamatic origin invaded Rwanda from the North. The Hutu a peaceful tribe of farmers could not defend themselv

Human Cloning: Government Intervention essay
Human Cloning Isn't as Scary as It Sounds The recent news of the successful cloning of an adult sheep— in which the sheep's DNA was inserted into an unfertilized sheep egg to produce a lamb with identical DNA—has generated an outpouring of ethical concerns. These concerns are not about Dolly

Homeless: What Should The Government Do? essay
How Should We Treat the Homeless? I think that to treat all homeless people in one certain way would be hard for me to do because there are many reasons for a person to be homeless, and some of them should be treated differently from others. I feel that the runaways and drug addicts don't