Term paper on Censorship Unconstitutional

Free Censorship Unconstitutional papers

Political Islam Failed in Algeria
Has Political Islam Failed in Algeria? The question whether Political Islam has failed or not due to the internal structure of the Islamic political movement, in either Algeria or any other country in the Islamic World, is an important question for the analysis of the politicized Islamic ph

Bill Clinton's Actions
Stanley Renshons' High Hopes: Clinton's Actions Throughout Stanley Renshons' book, High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition, the president's ability to govern has to do with three main concepts: ambition, courage, and integrity. Proving this, Renshon believe

Against Censoring Harmless Obscene Language

Why the !@#$ would any &*$% head want to censor @#$ &*$% offensive language? I

mean what the !@#$??

Did any of that offend anyone? Would it if I had used the actual words?

I hope it wouldn't because I sure didn't intend for it to. But then again, if

it did, well, don't take this personally, but, you don't need to be reading this.

I'm sorry, but I am not forcing you to. No one is. Close your eyes if someone

puts it in front of you, sing the Macarena a loud if someone reads it to you,

whatever. The fact of the matter is, freedom of speech is the law. I have in my

hand, not that you would know this, the Constitution of the United States of

America. In this constitution, there is this little thing called the Bill of

Rights which contains the first ten amendments, the first being the freedom of

speech. Article I of the United States Constitution states, "Congress shall

make no law...abridging the freedom of speech." Translated, this asserts that I

can say what ever the !@#$ I want to.† Ooh, I'm sorry, I hope you closed your

eyes and washed your ears out with soap. If not, too $%@# bad!

My belief is that nothing should be censored. Nothing. It is every

person's right and responsibility to shield him or herself from any language and

other audio and visual provided I do not say anything false which could hurt

another person's reputation messages that is found demeaning to the individual.

One person may find my !@#$%& language offensive, yet another may find my

language rather humorous and meaningful. I feel that when I use offensive

language, I am more thoroughly stressing my point. Allow me to demonstrate my

point. I have just been shot in the knee cap on my way to the Noble Prize Award

Dinner, and I will now be disqualified as a contestant for the Noble Peace Prize.

I then say to the bad man, "Ow...that hurt. Why...did you...do...that...to me?" The man

who has done this awful deed will feel no remorse and carry on whistling It's a

wonderful life. Now, let's try this again with a more meaningful message. "Son

of a !@%$#!!! What the !@#$ did you @#$ &*$% do that for you #$%& ^*%&$ #$$

%&$% $&*% &$ $%*$%????" The man will now have a better sense of what pain he

has brought me. He will still obviously run and hide and do nothing about what

he did, but he'll more than likely feel more guilty for what he did.

Censoring is a big issue...