Should Cloning Be Permitted Term paper

While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (should cloning be permitted )
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!

Should Human Cloning Be Permitted?

For years, part of the American public, and humans in general, have been fascinated

with the possibility of creating human life by other than natural means. There are many who

strongly disagree with the idea of human cloning. It certainly wasn't surprising when they

were able to clone a sheep and will not be the least surprised if someday scientist's

will be able to clone a human being. Should cloning for human benefits or even human

cloning itself be allowed in society today? That is a question we must ask ourselves?

On one side of the issue are those who believe that human cloning should be permitted.

One thing that shows this, is what human cloning research may bring. Those who opposed

to a ban believe that human cloning research could bring substantial benefits, including the

development of new treatments for cystic fibrosis, other diseases and the ability to create

animal with normal compatible organs for transplant. (1."Should Congress Prohibit All

Human Cloning Experimentation",Pg 34). From my opinion, I believe that human cloning

is just a huge step towards negativism in human life's, rather than simply being the next

step in fertility technology. There might be a possibility that human cloning research may

result in the discovery of a cure for diseases and the growing of human organs, but the

disadvantages are that many years as well as money may be need it.

Also several experts told the committee that cloning might be the only chance for many

infertile couples to have their own genetically related children.(2.Gorman,Pg66). For what I

see these cases are rarely seen, and the little amount of couples who suffer of infertility are

more likely to adopt a child. Infertility, is not the cause. This is not the main reason why

scientists are coming up with the idea of human cloning. What I believe is that scientists

are just making propaganda in order to make the public to get on their side.

Another reason is what could happened if cloning is ban. What about consequences of

banning a technology- death, disease, disability, indignity, on happiness, and blighted life's

that would result from imposing limits on cloning discoveries and advances (3.Bailey,Pg66).

What might possibly happen if cloning is ban, scientist's as well as experts believe that

efforts to ban cloning could drastically stop the creation of new medicines that would help

millions of people. What I believe is that cloning might be a discovery for scientists

to duplicate human life's. However, I certainly don't' believe that this discovery would go

further than that. Simply for the cost and waste of time.

Furthermore, Clinton took two swift steps: he called for moratorium on the use of

federal funds for human cloning research and he asked his national biothetics advisory

commission to let him know within 90 days whether the new technology should be even

.

more tightly controlled. (4.Gorman,Pg66). In my opinion, I state that, no matter who pays

for it or for what reason is done, should be made a criminal offense in the U.S. The

president doesn't have no right to spend federal funds in a research that most likely would

be denied by congress, plus is just a waste of time and money.

In addition, can poor people afford cloning. More likely, the cost of genetic

treatments will drop substantially, and poor people in the future will be much richer than

poor people today are, so they will easily take advantages of the new medical treatment.

(5.Bailey,Pg66). This is a nonsense, no poor family is going to be richer , I mean how.

In my point of view, I believe that they are going to be more poorer than they are. Simply

because of their jobs, their job skills might not even be needed. Come on, be realistic

technology is going to be more advanced and robots might even replaced their jobs.

However, In the future this treatment is going to be more advanced, and the rich will take

advantage of the new technologies, so their children will be smarter and free of diseases.

Mean while, the poor will suffer of diseases and lack of learning.

Moreover, the supporters for human cloning argue that human cloning should be

allowed, as the research may have to potential to eliminate many of the world's problems

such as animal extinction and can also benefit man kind in many ways. (6.'Should Human

Cloning Be Allowed", Pg1). It has been said and debated that scientist should not take

the work of god into their own hands, but if they do so, the only problem that they could

cause, is that they could destroy the age old concept of "father and "mother".

Finally the advantages of human cloning. Providing better research capabilities to find

cures to many present diseases, bringing back friends or relatives who have passed away

by cloning an identical copy, providing children for women who are single and do not wish

to have artificial insemination, and the choice of physical characteristics (who to look like).

(7."Should Human Cloning Be Allowed",Pg1). My view and thoughts to all this advantages

are that human cloning may produce another "Hitler" and other racial violent conspirators.

Secondly, human cloning is not at all "natural" meaning that a child born of cloning is not

going to have the same thoughts and he or she are just going to be an unethical, immoral

person and last but not least human cloning would alter the very meaning of humanity.

On the other side there are many who correctly believe that human cloning should not

be allowed. One thing that strongly disagrees is what possible consequence can be

produced by cloning. A child born of cloning would face " An enormous weight of social

and parental expectation about what and who that child should be". (8. Seppa,Pg367).

From my opinion, I believe that a child born of cloning will react depending on it's

environment. If the child is raised around scientist's and is treated as...

You should cite this paper as follows:

MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 25 May, 2012 from
    <http://essaymania.com/34457/should-cloning-be-permitted->

More College Papers

Shop online or At the Malls? essay
Shop Online or At the Malls? Radiation, sore eyes, fatigue carpal tunnel syndrome and characteristics of a hermit. These are the common “sickness” people get when working with computers too long. Shopping is one of the largest industries in the world. For the people who decide to shop on the

shoplifting essay
Shoplifting In the stage of adolescence sometimes there are things that people do that are less than admirable. In my case I made a mistake that I would later pay the consequences for and learn from my mistake. It was a beautiful sunny day at the very beginning of my summer break after my ju

Sherman's March essay
Sherman’s March In November of 1864, Major General William Tecumseh Sherman cut a 300-mile long, 60-mile wide corridor of destruction across the Confederate State of Georgia. He burned every thing in his path. He torched plantations, bridges, crops, factories, and mills. The goal of this war of