Two advantages of Single-sex Schools In the article âSingle-sex classrooms the latest way to challenge gender roles in grade schoolâ, the writer, Madeleine White, first mentions the fact that more and more single-sex classrooms have been instituted recently. Then, she gives some evidence of the advantages and disadvantages by using ideas of other educators. With this in mind, I do believe that single-sex classrooms are a good idea to create a better academic environment for students. Most importantly, being separated by sex encourages students to break down outdated gender-stereotypes and helps construct their self-identity more effectively. I agree with some advocators that single-sex education can break down gender stereotypes, resulting in broadening educational prospects for both girls and boys, and reducing general distractions among students. First of all, gender-stereotypes are fixed and overgeneralized attitudes and behavior that are considered normal and appropriate for a person based on his or her biological sex. For example, in co-education schools, girls are more likely to choose art, but boys prefer to choose science. However, the supporter of single-sex education Dr. Leonard Sax says: âWe want more girls engaged in robotics and computer programming and physics and engineering ;we want more boys engaged in poetry and creative writing and Spanish languageâ (Dr. Leonard Sax). There are different attitudes translating into the greater choice of non-traditional subjects among students in single-sex schools. Girls are free of the pressure to compete with boys in male-dominated subjects such as math and science. Boys, on the other hand, can more easily pursue traditionally \"feminine\" interests such as music and poetry. Thus, single-sex education provides an opportunity to broaden studentsâ horizons and allow them to feel free to explore their own strengths and interests, without the constraints of gender stereotypes. Furthermore, in my opinion, separating students by sex helps to avoid gender-based distractions among students, providing them with a better environment to flourish growth and learning. As we can see from research, âBoys and girls in single-sex schools were more likely to be better behaved and to find learning more enjoyable and the curriculum more relevant as there were fewer distractionsâ (Single Sex Schools vs. Co-Ed schools). In co-education schools, being at such a sensitive adolescent age, girls may become easily fascinated with boys, or boys may flirt and even bully girls. However, single-sex environments make everyone the same gender, which enables students to avoid distractions from the opposite sex, so that they are able to focus more on academic performance and have higher educational aspirations. On the other hand, I believe that attending a single-sex school gives students the opportunity to construct self-identity in a positive environment which is crucial for them. Firstly, self-identity is the sum total of all the elements that make up who we are. Students generally build an increased sense of self-confidence in classes that are separated by gender. According to an experiment done by behavioral experts at the CRC Health Group: âIt is shown that the close-knit grouping of an all-boys class may help a shy child overcome a fear that the member of the opposite sex will laugh at himâ (Erica Loop). It is clear to see that a single-sex school encourages students to participate more often, boosting their curiosity and confidence in succeeding in the academic environment by breeding a sense of comfort and lessening the stress of being marginalized or isolated by the other sex. Another benefit of single-sex education is that students can assume all the positions of leadership, which helps them to become well-prepared in the future. A survey conducted by the National Coalition of Girls\' Schools found that, â93 percentage of the women surveyed felt that they had more leadership opportunities and that 63 percent felt they were well-prepared for the âreal wordââ (Amanda Morin). In single-sex schools, students have many more chances to participate, influence and lead in every opportunity without competing with or being occupied by peers of the opposite sex, so that, they promote leadership and make themselves more competitive for a wider context in the future. In brief, I think that single-sex classrooms are a good idea for students. The information above provides some support for the premise that single-sex education can be helpful, especially for certain outcomes related to gender-stereotype break-down and identity-construct. There are also many other benefits of this type of education, such as addressing the unique learning styles of boys and girls, and decreasing sex bias in teacher-student interaction. Everybody wants to have a successful education and the single-sex school is clearly a system that a lot of people want. Works Cited Loop, Erica. âHow Do Single Sex Schools Boost Self-Esteem?â Web log post. eHow. Demand Media, 1999-2013. Web. 21 October 2013. . Morin, Amanda. âSingle Sex Education Advantages-3 Advantages of Single Sex Education for Girls.â About.com. About.com, 2013. Web. 21 October 2013. . âSingle Sex School vs. Co-Ed Schools.â TARGET STUDY. Target Informatics, 2013. Web. 21 October 2013. . White, Madeleine. âSingle-sex classrooms the latest way to challenge gender roles ingrade school.â The Globe and Mail.9 Jul. 12.Web.3 Sept. 12. .