Microsoft And Government Essay
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (microsoft and government)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
The
economic system of the United States is modeled after the theory of capitalism.
"Capitalism supports free enterprise - private business operating without
government regulation (Janda 22)." The United States does regulate private
businesses. Sometimes special circumstances arise which threaten to weaken the
overall economic stability of the country. In order to sufficiently deal with
these situations, the United States government has passed many laws granting
certain groups the authority to bring attention to and to stop the threat. This
is extremely important in terms of its effects on individuals. It protects the
freedoms of individuals, maintains order and stability, and attempts to promote
equality. One example of the ability of the United States government to
interfere with the natural progression of the American capitalist society, is
the existence of antitrust laws. These laws regulate certain actions of
individuals, trusts, corps, and combinations of corps in an attempt to prevent
or forcibly end a monopoly (Gilbert 21). Since 1989, Microsoft has been
repeatedly accused of violating antitrust laws. Many times these accusations
have led to an antitrust case being filed against Microsoft. These antitrust
laws and law suits are extremely important. Despite the verdicts of the cases,
antitrust laws served their purpose - to maintain the balance of the concepts of
freedom, order, and equality. Freedom is one of the three main concepts that
government must pursue for its people. Freedom has two main contexts in which it
is used which are freedom of and freedom from. "Freedom of is the absence
of constraints on behavior; it means freedom to do something (Janda 10)."
These types of freedoms guarantee individuals certain liberties such as freedom
of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and all other civil
liberties. These individual liberties are extremely important in a democracy.
"Freedom from . . . suggests immunity from fear and want." Freedom
from is also important in a democracy. It guarantees that certain things cannot
be done to anyone (Janda 10). This is important because it places limits on the
powers of the government. Another duty that government must pursue is
maintaining order. Order is "the rule of law to preserve life and protect
property. Maintaining order is the oldest purpose of government (Janda
A31)." There is also a third aspect associated with the idea of order. This
is a belief in maintaining traditional patterns of social relationships. Both
the preservation of life and the protection of property are pursued in similar
ways. The most common ways in which the government attempts to maintain order
are through government legislation, interpretation of the law, and enforcement
of the law. The final aspect of order is maintaining traditional patterns of
social behavior, also called social order. "Social order refers to
established patterns of authority in society and to traditional modes of
behavior (Janda 20)." Social order is, therefore, what society feels is
right. For this reason, social order is largely maintained by the society in
question along with the government. As the values, beliefs, ideas, etc of a
society gradually change over time, the social order will change as well. Even
though the social order is continuously changing, it is not upset. The norms of
the society change, butthe change is gradual. The social order is upset when
there is a sudden change in some value, belief, idea, etc of a large number of
the people within a society that is in contrast with the norm of the society and
causes the whole society to forget the original social order in order to argue
and put an end to the new "untraditional" values, beliefs, ideas, etc
that oppose the old societal norm. Order is a concept that applies to all
systems. Most of these systems use a completely unique way of maintaining order.
Similarly, different areas that humans try to maintain order within may have
other natural ways to better maintain its order. This is why the government must
work very hard in order to maintain order; it must decide whether government
intervention is needed or whether allowing the natural course of events is
appropriate to maintain order in the most proficient way. The last concept that
is essential for government to pursue is equality. The concept of equality has
many different senses in which it can be used. In terms of what government
should pursue, there are two main types of equality, political equality and
social equality. Political equality is defined as "each citizen has one and
only one vote (Janda 14)." The fact that all citizens have one and only one
vote is crucial in order for the American system of democratic government to
survive. From these two facts, equal votes for every citizen and a democratic
form of government, one might falsely assume that political equality in the
United States is in a perfect, ideological form where there is 100% political
equality. However, this is not the case. Individuals and groups of individuals
who control a large amount of some commodity such as wealth, power, or even a
respected family name are able to use their commodity to influence the political
agenda and the outcomes of legislation. The average American can simply vote on
election days and has no more say-so into government affairs except for possibly
writing a letter to or placing a call to a Representative, both with only a
minimal chance of having much of an impact. In the meantime, the wealthy are
also writing letters and making phone calls, but these letters and phone calls
are different. The letters are accompanied by large amounts of money, and the
phone calls are connected directly to a Representative. In this way, the wealthy
are able to influence a large amount of political decisions despite their small
percentage of the population. Because of these individuals and groups who use
their wealth or power to unfairly influence politics, many people argue that
equality in wealth, education, and status need to be guaranteed in order for
true political equality to occur. This concept in which everyone is completely
equal is the principle behind the second type of equality that government must
pursue, social equality. The success of social equality relies on two main
concepts. The first of these concepts is equality of opportunity. This
guarantees that everyone will have an equal chance of succeeding in life (Janda
14). In early America this ideal was believed by almost everyone. The idea of
laissez faire economics gave hope to everyone. It was said that everyone in
early America was "born bourgeois". From this middle class starting
point it was believed that everyone controlled their own future. Even today,
there is a sense of optimism in America. Equality of opportunity is not as much
a part of modern beliefs as in early America, but the belief that with hard work
anyone can succeed is still a firm belief held by most Americans. For true
social equality to exist, equality of opportunity had to be complemented by the
concept of equality of outcome, the concept needed for social equality. This
concept calls for the redistribution of wealth and status and for the government
to guarantee benefits such as housing, employment, medical care, and income
equally to all citizens (Janda 14). Some argue that, if implemented, these two
concepts would guarantee social equality and would, therefore, allow the ideal
of political equality to be reached. Whether or not these concepts would work is
under debate, but in terms of a system that has already been implemented and has
proven itself to work, the American system of government has made huge steps in
assuring equality to all of its...
MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 24 May, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/165834/microsoft-and-government>
More College Papers
McCarthy's Abuse of Power essay
In 1954 a young junior Senator from the state of Wisconsin held the entire
Senate in the palm of his hand. Senator Joseph R. McCarthy used an aggressive
strategy of lies, personal attacks, and propaganda in an aggressive attempt to
gain power. Was Senator McCarthy a crusader for the common good o
Marshall`s Court essay
Hamilton was a federalist and served as the secretary of the treasury in the
1890s. He was a strong supporter of a centralized federal government. He also
advocated loose interpretation of the u.s. constitution and the use of the
elastic clause. Which was an ambiguous power of the federal governm
Marshall And Constitution essay
In Thurgood Marshall's "A Bicentennial View From the Supreme Court",
Thurgood Marshall argues that the United States Constitution bicentennial
celebration should not be commemorated with narrow views concerning the birth of
the document, but rather should be seen as a living document, o
