Essay on Government Intervention Of The Internet

Government Intervention Of The Internet Term Papers

While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (government intervention of the internet)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!

During the past decade, our society has

become based solely on the ability to move

large amounts of information across large

distances quickly.  Computerization has

influenced everyone's life. The natural

evolution of computers and this need for

ultra-fast communications has caused a

global network of interconnected computers

to develop. This global net allows a person

to send E-mail across the world in mere

fractions of a second, and enables even

the common person to access information

world-wide. With advances such as software

that allows users with a sound card to

use the Internet as a carrier for long

distance voice calls and video conferencing, this

network is key to the future of the knowledge

society. At present, this net is the

epitome of the first amendment: free speech.

It is a place where people can speak

their mind without being reprimanded for

what they say, or how they choose to say it.

The key to the world-wide success of the

Internet is its protection of free speech, not

only in America, but in other countries

where free speech is not protected by a

constitution. To be found on the Internet

is a huge collection of obscene graphics,

Anarchists' cookbooks and countless other

things that offend some people. With over

30 million Internet users in the U.S.

alone (only 3 million of which surf the net from

home), everything is bound to offend someone.

The newest wave of laws floating

through law making bodies around the world

threatens to stifle this area of

spontaneity. Recently, Congress has been

considering passing laws that will make it

a crime punishable by jail to send "vulgar"

language over the net, and to export

encryption software. No matter how small,

any attempt at government intervention

in the Internet will stifle the greatest

communication innovation of this century. The

government wants to maintain control over

this new form of communication, and

they are trying to use the protection

of children as a smoke screen to pass laws that

will allow them to regulate and censor

the Internet, while banning techniques that

could eliminate the need for regulation.

Censorship of the Internet threatens to

destroy its freelance atmosphere, while

wide spread encryption could help prevent

the need for government intervention.

The current body of laws existing today

in America does not apply well to the

Internet. Is the Internet like a bookstore,

where servers cannot be expected to

review every title? Is it like a phone

company who must ignore what it carries

because of privacy? Is it like a broadcasting

medium, where the government

monitors what is broadcast? The trouble

is that the Internet can be all or none of

these things depending on how it's used.

The Internet cannot be viewed as one

type of transfer medium under current

broadcast definitions.

The Internet differs from broadcasting

media in that one cannot just happen upon a

vulgar site without first entering a complicated

address, or following a link from

another source. "The Internet is much

more like going into a book store and

choosing to look at adult magazines."

(Miller 75).

Jim Exon, a democratic senator from Nebraska,

wants to pass a decency bill

regulating the Internet. If the bill passes,

certain commercial servers that post

pictures of unclad beings, like those

run by Penthouse or Playboy, would of course

be shut down immediately or risk prosecution.

The same goes for any amateur

web site that features nudity, sex talk,

or rough language. Posting any dirty words

in a Usenet discussion group, which occurs

routinely, could make one liable for a

$50,000 fine and six months in jail. Even

worse, if a magazine that commonly runs

some of those nasty words in its pages,

The New Yorker for instance, decided to

post its contents on-line, its leaders

would be held responsible for a $100,000 fine

and two years in jail. Why does it suddenly

become illegal to post something that

has been legal for years in print? Exon's

bill apparently would also "criminalize

private mail," ... "I can call my brother

on the phone and say anything--but if I say

it on the Internet, it's illegal" (Levy

53).

Congress, in their pursuit of regulations,

seems to have overlooked the fact that the

majority of the adult material on the

Internet comes from overseas.  Although many

U.S. government sources helped fund Arpanet,

the predecessor to the Internet,

they no longer control it. Many of the

new Internet technologies, including the

World Wide Web, have come from overseas.

There is no clear boundary between

information held in the U.S. and information

stored in other countries. Data held in

foreign computers is just as accessible

as data in America, all it takes is the click of

a mouse to access. Even if our government

tried to regulate the Internet, we have

no control over what is posted in other

countries, and we have no practical way to

stop it.

The Internet's predecessor was originally

designed to uphold communications after

a nuclear attack by rerouting data to

compensate for destroyed telephone lines and

servers. Today's Internet still works

on a similar design. The very nature this

design allows the Internet to overcome

any kind of barriers put in its way. If a

major line between two servers, say in

two countries, is cut, then the Internet users

will find another way around this obstacle.

This obstacle avoidance makes it

virtually impossible to separate an entire

nation from indecent information in other

countries. If it was physically possible

to isolate America's computers from the rest

of the world, it would be devastating

to our economy.

Recently, a major university attempted

to regulate what types of Internet access its

students had, with results reminiscent

of a 1960's protest. A research associate at

Carnegie Mellon University conducted a

study of pornography on the school's

computer networks. Martin Rimm put together

quite a large picture collection

(917,410 images) and he also tracked how

often each image had been downloaded

(a total of 6.4 million). Pictures of

similar content had recently been declared

obscene by a local court, and the school

feared they might be held responsible for

the content of its network. The school

administration quickly removed access to all

these pictures, and to the newsgroups

where most of this obscenity is suspected to

come from. A total of 80 newsgroups were

removed, causing a large disturbance

among the student body, the American Civil

Liberties Union, and the Electronic

Frontier Foundation, all of whom felt

this was unconstitutional. After only half a

week, the college had backed down, and

restored the newsgroups. This is a tiny

example of what may happen if the government

tries to impose censorship

(Elmer-Dewitt 102).

Currently, there is software being released

that promises to block children's access

to known X-rated Internet newsgroups and

sites. However, since most adults rely

on their computer literate children to

setup these programs, the children will be able

to find ways around them. This mimics

real life, where these children would surely

be able to get their hands on an adult

magazine. Regardless of what types of

software or safeguards are used to protect

the children of the Information age,

there will be ways around them. This necessitates

the education of the children to

deal with reality. Altered views of an

electronic world translate easily into altered

views of the real world. "When it comes

to our children, censorship is a far less

important issue than good parenting. We

must teach our kids that the Internet is a

extension and a reflection of the real

world, and we have to show them how to

enjoy the good things and avoid the bad

things. This isn't the government's

responsibility. It's ours (Miller 76)."

Not all restrictions on electronic speech

are bad. Most of the major on-line

communication companies have restrictions

on what their users can "say." They

must respect their customer's privacy,

however. Private E-mail content is off limits

to them, but they may act swiftly upon

anyone who spouts obscenities in a public

forum.

Self regulation by users and servers is

the key to avoiding government imposed

intervention. Many on-line sites such

as Playboy and Penthouse have started to

regulated themselves. Both post clear

warnings that adult content lies ahead and

lists the countries where this is illegal.

The film and videogame industries subject

themselves to ratings, and if Internet

users want to avoid government imposed

regulations, then it is time they begin

to regulate themselves. It all boils down to

protecting children from adult material,

while protecting the first amendment right

to free speech between adults.

Government attempts to regulate the Internet

are not just limited to obscenity and

vulgar language, it also reaches into

other areas, such as data encryption.

By nature, the Internet is an insecure

method of transferring data. A single E-mail

packet may pass through hundreds of computers

from its source to destination. At

each computer, there is the chance that

the data will be archived and someone may

intercept that data. Credit card numbers

are a frequent target of hackers.

Encryption is a means of encoding...

The rest of the paper is available free of charge to our registered users. The registration process just couldn't be easier. Log in or register now. It is all free!
You should cite this paper as follows:

MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 12 Feb, 2012 from
    <http://essaymania.com/162246/government-intervention-of-the-internet>

More College Papers

Data Compression

‘Data Compression’ just sounds complicated.  Don’t be
afraid, compression is our good friend for many reasons.  It saves hard drive
space.  It makes data files to handle.  It also cuts those immense file download
times from the Internet.  Wouldn’t it be

Tool of the Trade

 In any game, the equipment players use determines the way the game unfolds. Try to imagine a soccer game played with an American football! Or try playing tennis with the wooden racquets of thirty years ago. Change the equipment, and you discover a very different game. As part of my look

Programming Under The Wizard's Spell

The computer is a tool that has become indispensable to the modern family and company. In flourishing so successfully the computer has passed from incredibly complex and unusable to anyone how was not well versed in its intricacies, to consumer oriented and user-friendly. In Ellen Ullman's es