Government Intervention Of The Internet Essay
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (government intervention of the internet)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
During the past decade, our society has
become based solely on the ability to move
large amounts of information across large
distances quickly. Computerization has
influenced everyone's life. The natural
evolution of computers and this need for
ultra-fast communications has caused a
global network of interconnected computers
to develop. This global net allows a person
to send E-mail across the world in mere
fractions of a second, and enables even
the common person to access information
world-wide. With advances such as software
that allows users with a sound card to
use the Internet as a carrier for long
distance voice calls and video conferencing, this
network is key to the future of the knowledge
society. At present, this net is the
epitome of the first amendment: free speech.
It is a place where people can speak
their mind without being reprimanded for
what they say, or how they choose to say it.
The key to the world-wide success of the
Internet is its protection of free speech, not
only in America, but in other countries
where free speech is not protected by a
constitution. To be found on the Internet
is a huge collection of obscene graphics,
Anarchists' cookbooks and countless other
things that offend some people. With over
30 million Internet users in the U.S.
alone (only 3 million of which surf the net from
home), everything is bound to offend someone.
The newest wave of laws floating
through law making bodies around the world
threatens to stifle this area of
spontaneity. Recently, Congress has been
considering passing laws that will make it
a crime punishable by jail to send "vulgar"
language over the net, and to export
encryption software. No matter how small,
any attempt at government intervention
in the Internet will stifle the greatest
communication innovation of this century. The
government wants to maintain control over
this new form of communication, and
they are trying to use the protection
of children as a smoke screen to pass laws that
will allow them to regulate and censor
the Internet, while banning techniques that
could eliminate the need for regulation.
Censorship of the Internet threatens to
destroy its freelance atmosphere, while
wide spread encryption could help prevent
the need for government intervention.
The current body of laws existing today
in America does not apply well to the
Internet. Is the Internet like a bookstore,
where servers cannot be expected to
review every title? Is it like a phone
company who must ignore what it carries
because of privacy? Is it like a broadcasting
medium, where the government
monitors what is broadcast? The trouble
is that the Internet can be all or none of
these things depending on how it's used.
The Internet cannot be viewed as one
type of transfer medium under current
broadcast definitions.
The Internet differs from broadcasting
media in that one cannot just happen upon a
vulgar site without first entering a complicated
address, or following a link from
another source. "The Internet is much
more like going into a book store and
choosing to look at adult magazines."
(Miller 75).
Jim Exon, a democratic senator from Nebraska,
wants to pass a decency bill
regulating the Internet. If the bill passes,
certain commercial servers that post
pictures of unclad beings, like those
run by Penthouse or Playboy, would of course
be shut down immediately or risk prosecution.
The same goes for any amateur
web site that features nudity, sex talk,
or rough language. Posting any dirty words
in a Usenet discussion group, which occurs
routinely, could make one liable for a
$50,000 fine and six months in jail. Even
worse, if a magazine that commonly runs
some of those nasty words in its pages,
The New Yorker for instance, decided to
post its contents on-line, its leaders
would be held responsible for a $100,000 fine
and two years in jail. Why does it suddenly
become illegal to post something that
has been legal for years in print? Exon's
bill apparently would also "criminalize
private mail," ... "I can call my brother
on the phone and say anything--but if I say
it on the Internet, it's illegal" (Levy
53).
Congress, in their pursuit of regulations,
seems to have overlooked the fact that the
majority of the adult material on the
Internet comes from overseas. Although many
U.S. government sources helped fund Arpanet,
the predecessor to the Internet,
they no longer control it. Many of the
new Internet technologies, including the
World Wide Web, have come from overseas.
There is no clear boundary between
information held in the U.S. and information
stored in other countries. Data held in
foreign computers is just as accessible
as data in America, all it takes is the click of
a mouse to access. Even if our government
tried to regulate the Internet, we have
no control over what is posted in other
countries, and we have no practical way to
stop it.
The Internet's predecessor was originally
designed to uphold communications after
a nuclear attack by rerouting data to
compensate for destroyed telephone lines and
servers. Today's Internet still works
on a similar design. The very nature this
design allows the Internet to overcome
any kind of barriers put in its way. If a
major line between two servers, say in
two countries, is cut, then the Internet users
will find another way around this obstacle.
This obstacle avoidance makes it
virtually impossible to separate an entire
nation from indecent information in other
countries. If it was physically possible
to isolate America's computers from the rest
of the world, it would be devastating
to our economy.
Recently, a major university attempted
to regulate what types of Internet access its
students had, with results reminiscent
of a 1960's protest. A research associate at
Carnegie Mellon University conducted a
study of pornography on the school's
computer networks. Martin Rimm put together
quite a large picture collection
(917,410 images) and he also tracked how
often each image had been downloaded
(a total of 6.4 million). Pictures of
similar content had recently been declared
obscene by a local court, and the school
feared they might be held responsible for
the content of its network. The school
administration quickly removed access to all
these pictures, and to the newsgroups
where most of this obscenity is suspected to
come from. A total of 80 newsgroups were
removed, causing a large disturbance
among the student body, the American Civil
Liberties Union, and the Electronic
Frontier Foundation, all of whom felt
this was unconstitutional. After only half a
week, the college had backed down, and
restored the newsgroups. This is a tiny
example of what may happen if the government
tries to impose censorship
(Elmer-Dewitt 102).
Currently, there is software being released
that promises to block children's access
to known X-rated Internet newsgroups and
sites. However, since most adults rely
on their computer literate children to
setup these programs, the children will be able
to find ways around them. This mimics
real life, where these children would surely
be able to get their hands on an adult
magazine. Regardless of what types of
software or safeguards are used to protect
the children of the Information age,
there will be ways around them. This necessitates
the education of the children to
deal with reality. Altered views of an
electronic world translate easily into altered
views of the real world. "When it comes
to our children, censorship is a far less
important issue than good parenting. We
must teach our kids that the Internet is a
extension and a reflection of the real
world, and we have to show them how to
enjoy the good things and avoid the bad
things. This isn't the government's
responsibility. It's ours (Miller 76)."
Not all restrictions on electronic speech
are bad. Most of the major on-line
communication companies have restrictions
on what their users can "say." They
must respect their customer's privacy,
however. Private E-mail content is off limits
to them, but they may act swiftly upon
anyone who spouts obscenities in a public
forum.
Self regulation by users and servers is
the key to avoiding government imposed
intervention. Many on-line sites such
as Playboy and Penthouse have started to
regulated themselves. Both post clear
warnings that adult content lies ahead and
lists the countries where this is illegal.
The film and videogame industries subject
themselves to ratings, and if Internet
users want to avoid government imposed
regulations, then it is time they begin
to regulate themselves. It all boils down to
protecting children from adult material,
while protecting the first amendment right
to free speech between adults.
Government attempts to regulate the Internet
are not just limited to obscenity and
vulgar language, it also reaches into
other areas, such as data encryption.
By nature, the Internet is an insecure
method of transferring data. A single E-mail
packet may pass through hundreds of computers
from its source to destination. At
each computer, there is the chance that
the data will be archived and someone may
intercept that data. Credit card numbers
are a frequent target of hackers.
Encryption is a means of encoding...
MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 26 May, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/162246/government-intervention-of-the-internet>
More College Papers
Data Compression just sounds complicated.
Dont be
afraid, compression is our good friend
for many reasons. It saves hard drive
space. It makes data files to handle.
It also cuts those immense file download
times from the Internet. Wouldnt
it be
In any game, the equipment players use determines the way the game unfolds. Try to imagine a soccer game played with an American football! Or try playing tennis with the wooden racquets of thirty years ago. Change the equipment, and you discover a very different game. As part of my look
Programming Under The Wizard's Spell essay
The computer is a tool that has become indispensable to the modern family and company. In flourishing so successfully the computer has passed from incredibly complex and unusable to anyone how was not well versed in its intricacies, to consumer oriented and user-friendly. In Ellen Ullman's es