Cloning Why We Shouldn T Be Against It Essay
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (cloning why we shouldn t be against it)
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!
You have been told that you are unique.
The belief that there is no one else like you in the whole world made you
feel special and proud. This belief may not be true in the future.
The world was stunned by the news in late
February 1997 that a British embryologist named Ian Wilmut and his research
team had successfully cloned a lamb named Dolly from an adult sheep. Dolly
was created by replacing the DNA of one sheep's egg with the DNA of another
sheep's udder. While plants and lower forms of animal life have been successfully
cloned for many years now, before Wilmut's announcement it had been thought
by many to be unlikely that such a procedure could be performed on higher
mammals. The world media was immediately filled with heated discussions
about the ethical implications of cloning.
Some of the most powerful people in the
world have felt compelled to act against this threat. President Clinton
swiftly imposed a ban on federal funding for human-cloning research. Bills
are in the works in both houses of Congress to outlaw human cloning which
it taken to be a fundamentally evil thing that must be stopped. But what
is exactly bad about it? From an ethical point of view , it is difficult
to see exactly what is wrong with cloning human beings. The people who
are afraid of cloning tend to think that someone will break into Napoleon's
Tomb, steal some DNA and make 2000 emperors. In reality, cloning would
be probably used by infertile people who now use donated sperm, eggs, or
embryos. Do the potential harms outweigh the potential benefits of cloning?
From what we know now, they don't. Therefore, we should not rush to ban
a potentially useful method of helping infertile, genetically at-risk,
or single people to become parents.
We can start by asking whether human beings
have a right to reproduce. I say " Yes". I have no moral right to tell
other people they shouldn't be able to have children, and I don't see that
Bill Clinton has that right either. If humans have a right to reproduce,
what right does society have to limit the means? Essentially all reproduction
is done these days with medical help- at delivery, and even before. Truly
natural human reproduction would make pregnancy-related death the number.1
killer of adult women.
OF course, some forms of medical help are
more invasive than others. With in vitro fertilization, the sperm and egg
are combined in the lab and surgically implanted in the womb. Less than
two decades ago, a similar concern was raised over the ethical issues involved
in " test-tube babies". Today, nearly 30,000 such babies have been born
in the United States alone. Many parents have been made happy. So what
low or principle says that one combination of genetic material in a flask
is Ok, but another is not?
Nature clones people all the time, and
rather frequently. Approximately 1 in 1000 birth is of identical twins.
However, despite how many or how few individual characteristics twins have
in common, they are different people. They have their own identities, their
own thoughts, and their own rights. They enter different occupations, get
different diseases, have different experiences with marriage, alcohol,
community leadership, and etc. They have different souls as would cloned
individuals. Even if somebody did clone 2,000 Napoleons, they would be
even more different from their parents than twins are from each other because
the cloned child would be raised in a different historical period. The
argument that cloning robs individuals of their individuality therefore
doesn't hold.
Perhaps the strongest ethical argument
against cloning is that it could lead to a new , unfamiliar type of family
relationship. We have no idea what it would be like to grow up as the child
of a parent who seems to know you from inside. Some psychological characteristics
may be biologically based and the parent will know in advance what crises Cloning is Ethically and Morally Wrong essay The question shakes us all to our very
souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all
to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human.
The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically
and morally wrong. Scientists The evidence against President Clinton
for sexual misconduct is very strong. There have been too many scandals
that have surrounded his presidency. This forces the citizens of the United
States to deny his plea of innocence. In the spring of 1995, Monica Lewinsky
graduated from Lewis and Clar Clause and Effect: Anti-Homosexual Laws essay In Edinburgh, a homosexual man is four
times more likely to be attacked than a heterosexual man.
This fact has been iterated so much by
the media over the past few weeks that it would be a challenge to find
one Scot who could not quote it accurately. One would think that this alarming
s
MLA Style
. EssayMania.com. Retrieved on 24 May, 2012 from
<http://essaymania.com/161788/cloning-why-we-shouldn-t-be-against-it>More College Papers