Essay on Oswald Trial Of The Century

Free Oswald Trial Of The Century papers

Pain in the ass
Les personnages sans nom (la Ménagère, la Serveuse, l'Epicier...) permettent d'inscrire l'intrigue dans le cadre d'une réalité anonyme ; Les noms d'animaux (Monsieur Papillon, Madame Boeuf, Dudard) sont ceux de personnages sérieux, dont le patronyme évoque ironiquement l'animalité ; Les no

Neal and Jesse Eldridge
Neal and Jesse Eldridge are two young men on trial. For over ten years, they suffered severe physical, emotional, and psychological abuse at the hands of their father. It ended the day they shot and killed him. Now Neal and Jesse are charged, as adults, with first degree murder; they face the

The State vs. Lee Harvey Oswald. For the prosecution Vincent Bugliosi, and for the defense, James Spence. Both sides have their cases to make. Vincent Bugliosi, along with the United States of America contend that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the murdering of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. On the other hand the Defense will contend that Lee Harvey Oswald was only a patsy in a conspiracy possibly involving Jack Ruby, the man who assassinated Oswald, or even the Government.

The prosecution’s case against Lee Harvey Oswald is one based entirely on the government’s belief that Oswald was the lone assassin. All evidence found, points to Oswald being the only assassin, but if he was, why did the government take cameras away from people who recorded or took pictures of the assassination? Why did the government use doctors not licensed for the autopsy on the President of the United States? Also, how did they know who to arrest in such a short amount of time?

The defense had to try to show the public Lee Harvey Oswald as a normal person, not a madman or a killer. They also have to answer a few questions such as, why did Oswald leave before roll call at the Texas Book Depository? Why was Oswald carrying a loaded revolver when the police apprehended him? Also, if Oswald didn’t do it, why did he hit a police officer when he was getting arrested?

Reasons given by the government for taking away peoples film was that they wanted to analyze it to look for the assassin and evidence. This film taken from people was never returned, except for the Zapruder film. If the government kept saying that there was no conspiracy and that all evidence pointed to one assassin, why not give back the film. This troubles me and during the entire trial Bugliosi never once was able to explain that.

The whole autopsy situation was a total mess. During the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigation into the autopsy of President Kennedy, they found the following errors:

1.The President’s body was taken out of the hands of those responsible for investigation of the death and autopsy-Texas authorities.

2.Those performing the autopsy had insufficient training and experience to evaluate a death from gunshot wounds.

3.Physicians who treated the President at Parkland Hospital were not consulted before beginning the autopsy.

4.Proper photographs were not taken.

5.The President’s clothing was not examined.

6.The autopsy procedure was incomplete because:

a. External examination failed to accurately locate wounds

b. The bullet tracks were not dissected to determine their course through the body.

c. The angles of the bullet tracks through the body were not measured relative to the body axis.

d. The brain was not properly examined and sectioned.

7. The report was incomplete, inaccurate, and prepared without reference to photographs.

8. The head wound location was incorrect.

9. Other wounds of the President’s body were not localized with reference to fixed body landmarks so as to permit reconstruction of trajectories.

About an hour after the assassination a Dallas Police Radio reports that their "suspect" is in the library, when the police reach there, they immediately reply back, "It was the wrong man." How could the police so quickly deny that the person in the library was not the assassin? The only way to say so quickly that it was the wrong man, was because they knew who the right man was. The library was a known hangout for Oswald, who lived just six blocks from it.

Why would the police send 15 officers, along with two FBI agents and the Dallas Assistant District Attorney Bill Alexander, just to arrest a man for sneaking into the Texas Theatre? Also when the lights go up in the Texas Theatre, it is rumored that a man sitting near the front tells one of the police officers that "the man they are looking for is in the third row to the back and not in the balcony."

Know one knows for sure why Oswald was missing during role call at the Texas School Book Depository. Those that believe he shot Kennedy say he was nervous and afraid he would get caught, which they say explains why he shot Officer JD Tippet. Others that say he was the patsy say he left because he found out that he was the patsy.

When Oswald was arrested, they found a loaded revolver in his possession. Many people say that he was nervous and scared and when he saw Officer Tippit, he shot him, afraid he was going to jail. Others say he was scared because he knew he was the patsy and was running scared and was framed for the Tippet murder too.

Another interesting thing to know about the Oswald case was that when he was arrested for the murder of Officer Tippet, the detectives took paraffin casts of Oswald’s hands and right cheek. The tests came back positive for his hands and negative for his right cheek, indicating that he may have fired a pistol, but definently not a rifle.

After reviewing all of the evidence and testimony presented by the witnesses, I find Lee Harvey Oswald Not Guilty of the assassination of John F. Kennedy. I believe there was a conspiracy,...