Pragmatism Vs. Idealism (A Man For All Seasons) Essay

Pragmatism Vs Idealism A Man For All Seasons Essay

While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (pragmatism vs idealism a man for all seasons )
Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time!

Morality is often overpowered by materialistic pursuits. In A Man for All Seasons ,Robert Bolt shows the corruption of those who put self interest above all other values. His use of such characters as Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich, Chapuys and Wolsey help convey this corruption. There is yet another character who is a pragmatist that Bolt successfully represents. Thomas More is an idealist as well as a pragmatist, for he is prepared to give up everything for his beliefs and takes all precautions possible to make his case watertight . It is through this pragmatism and idealism that Robert Bolt shows the corruption of the times. Thomas More believed in his ideals to such an extent that he was prepared to sacrifice his life for them, if the need arrived. He was a firm believer in the separation of Church and State. When the King tried to start the reformation of England and the Church by a simple Act of Parliament called the Act of Supremacy, Thomas refused to sign it. He believed that the indictment of the King was grounded in an Act of Parliament which is directly repugnant to law of God. The King in Parliament cannot bestow he Supremacy of the Church because it is a Spiritual Supremacy! And more to this the immunity of the Church is promised both in Magna Carta and the Kings own Coronation Oath! (Bolt, p. 92) The marriage was yet another reason why More refused to sign the Act. He knew that if he signed it then he would accept the King as the Supreme Head of Church and thus give the King the power to dispense with the dispensation which to him was against his morals and religion. Of course the marriage was associated with other things -attack on the abbeys, the whole Reformation policy-to which More was violently opposed. When told by Norfolk that his parish attire is a disrespect to the King and his office. More replies that the service of God is not a dishonor to any office (Bolt, p.26) Even though he loves the King to death as proved by Mores loyalty towards him, he values his morality and religion more. For his conscience is a little area where I must rule myself (Bolt,p.34). His position is perfectly described in his belief that when statesmen forsake their own private conscience for the sake of their public duties... they lead their country by a short route to chaos. His idealism is clearly shown in his refusal to take the oath for the oath to him was an invitation to God to act as a witness as well as a judge and the consequence of a perjury was damnation. He is a man who is anchored to his principles (Bolt, p.36). The issue is not about what other people see his beliefs as but not that I believe it, but that I believe it... (Bolt, p.53). He needs to be true to his conscience and cannot let other people interfere with these decisions, for when he faces his creator it is he alone who will answer Him. In matters of conscience, the loyal subject is more bounded to be loyal to his conscience than to any other thing (Bolt, p.89) Even towards his tragic end he is so sure of his righteousness that he advises the headsman to be not afraid of your office. You send me to God. He will not refuse one who is to blithe to go to him (Bolt, p.94) Thus, it becomes clear that Thomas alone possess the moral squint that no other character possesses in the play. Thomas More is a pragmatist with a lawyers mind and a loyal heart. He was able to foresee the future and knew exactly what could be used against him later on. When Thomas More realized that the silver goblet that he received from the woman was a bribe he immediately got rid of it. He gave it to Rich, for he knew the type of person Rich was, and gave the woman an impeccably correct judgment. Not surprisingly, the goblet was later used against him but due to More s actions, it held little substance. More s trust in the law was his trust in society ;his desperate sheltering beneath the forms of the law was his determination to remain in the shelter of society. To him the law was a forest in which he could hide and never be found ;it was a causeway upon which, so long as he keeps to it, a citizen may walk safely (Bolt, p. 89) Thus, with this belief More took every action to not to trap himself but rather be protected by the law. He avoided all events that may be misinterpreted as treason. When Signor Chapuys came to More to inform him that the people in Yorkshire were ready for resistance by force of arms, More deliberately misinterpreted it as Metaphorical arms. The breastplate of righteousness and the helmet of salvation. (Bolt, p. 51) He is able to see right through people and he knows he has spies in the house such as the steward looking for some evidence against him and thus he protects himself quit cleverly. Also, as soon as Norfolk arrives, More warns him of the rising in Yorkshire, thus proving his loyalty to the King and protecting himself. On Chapuys second arrival, he offers More a letter from the King of Spain, he doesn t lay a finger on it, for then he will be allying with the enemy. He further goes on to show it to Alice and everyone else that the seal has not been broken, thus showing that he has not read the letter. Even in the case of the Maid of Kent, More writes to her advising her to abstain from meddling with the affairs of Princes and the State (Bolt, p. 67). As a precaution, More gets it notarized and thus it is evidence in favor of him, not against him. Other then refusing every possible way of being disloyal, More uses silence as his main strategy. He was a man with a firm sense of his own self. He knew where he began and left off, what area of himself he could reveal to the encroachments of his enemies, and what to the encroachments of those he loved. He refuses to talk to anyone or declare his position on the Kings divorce. He knows that anything he says canbe used against him as treason and thus repeatedly says that he will answer to the King alone. The corruption of the times is evident when, after failing to find anything on More, Cromwell decides to put something in the cupboard (Bolt, p. 69). The laws that More hid behind are now twisted in such a way that he is charged with ingratitude and sentenced to death and it is this single event that Thomas More fails to foresee. Richard Rich, Thomas Cromwell, Chapuys, and Wolsey are
The rest of the paper is available free of charge to our registered users. The registration process just couldn't be easier. Log in or register now. It is all free!

More College Papers

Pragmatics Deixis And Conversational Implicature essay
1.1 The concept of deictic centre Deixis deals with the words and expressions whose reference relies entirely on the circumstances of the utterance. For that reason these special expressions and their meaning in discourse can only be understood in light of these circumstances. The term deictic cen

Power, Authority And Corruption In Macbeth essay
Power, Authority and Corruption in Macbeth "Authority poisons everybody who takes authority on himself " [Leninthis, 271], this quotation applies to Shakespeare's Macbeth. In the play, Macbeth commits regicide; the most heinous of all crimes in Elizabethan times, in order to become king himself. Ho

Portrait Of The Artist As A Young Man essay
Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man Stephen Dedalus is born of a woman, created of the earth; pure in his childhood innocence. From this beginning stems the birth of an artist, and from this the novel, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, James Joyce recounts Stephen's story. His journey is f